Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Side-by-side comparison. Updated 2026-06-13.
Verdict
Claude Fable 5 wins on higher overall score (9.6 vs 9.0, +0.6).
Both models score equally. Pick based on which strengths align with your workload.
At a Glance
| Attribute | Claude Fable 5 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Tags | Agentic Coding Intelligent Reasoning | Agentic Coding Intelligent |
| Context | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Input price | $10.00/1M | $3.00/1M |
| Output price | $15.00/1M | $15.00/1M |
| Input modalities | Image, Text | Image, Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
Claude Fable 5 Strengths
- Built for autonomous agentic workflows with native tool use and structured outputs
- 1M-token context window enables long-horizon tasks
- Strong reasoning capabilities with verifiable chain-of-thought
- Multimodal input: text, images, and files
- Competitive pricing at $10/$50 per million tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Strengths
- Frontier performance across coding, agents, and professional work
- Most capable Sonnet-class model — closing gap with Opus tier
- Excellent for iterative development and complex codebase navigation
- Confident computer use for web QA and workflow automation