Smart AI decisions start with LMRank.
Compare every major model side by side. Pick an AI that fits the work you actually have.
Browse by category
Why LMRank
An independent, transparent leaderboard built so you stop guessing which model to ship next.
Rankings built on the public data sources the field already trusts
- OpenRouter Models
- SWE-bench Benchmark
- Artificial Analysis Benchmark
- Exa Search
Latest articles
All articlesTop 3, three ways
Switch the facet to see the leaderboard sliced by rank, by release date, or by raw input-token cost.
Stop cross-referencing a dozen provider pages. Pick a model in 60 seconds.
Compare modelsGet the weekly AI digest
One email each Tuesday. New model releases, the rankings that actually moved, and a notable showcase from the week.
- New models, ranked. No fluff.
- The benchmarks we trust and why we trust them.
- One real-world showcase pulled from LMBench.
Recent additions
View all models| # | Model | Lab | Added |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | S Fugu Ultra | Sakana | 2026-06 |
| 02 | North Mini Code | Cohere | 2026-06 |
| 03 | GLM 5.2 | Z Ai | 2026-06 |
| 04 | Kimi K2.7 Code | Moonshotai | 2026-06 |
| 05 | Claude Fable 5 | Anthropic | 2026-06 |
About the LMRank LLM leaderboard
The LMRank LLM leaderboard tracks the major large language models so you can compare rank, pricing, context windows, release cadence, and capability fit for each task in one place. Every score is sourced from a public benchmark so you can audit the inputs and the methodology behind every ranking change.
Rankings move every week, and a single new release can reshuffle the top tools overnight. The LMRank LLM leaderboard exists so you do not have to cross-reference a dozen provider pages to decide which model is strongest, cheapest, or best aligned with the work you actually have. Browse by use case, compare tools side by side, or open any model for capability notes, context window details, and transparent per-token pricing across coding, reasoning, multimodal, and more.
LMRank pulls scores from OpenRouter, SWE-bench, Artificial Analysis, and Exa, and refreshes rankings as new models and benchmarks land. The leaderboard is independent: no pay-to-rank, no model gets a boost because its lab paid for placement. If you spot a score that looks wrong or a model that is missing, the methodology page explains how to flag it for review.