Claude Fable 5 vs Thinking Machines: Inkling
Side-by-side comparison. Updated 2026-07-18.
Summary
Compare Claude Fable 5 and Thinking Machines: Inkling across pricing, context window, modalities, strengths, weaknesses, and best-fit workloads.
Use the details below to weigh cost, context, modalities, and workload fit.
At a Glance
| Attribute | Claude Fable 5 | Thinking Machines: Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Thinkingmachines |
| Tags | Agentic Coding Intelligent Reasoning Long Context | Intelligent Coding Reasoning Agentic Open Weight Multimodal Image Input Long Context |
| Context | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Input price | $10.00/1M | $1.00/1M |
| Output price | $50.00/1M | $4.05/1M |
| Input modalities | Image, Text | Text, Image, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
Claude Fable 5 Strengths
- #1 Intelligence Index at 64.9
- 1M-token context window
- 95% on SWE-bench Verified
- Strong agentic and coding performance
- Vision and scientific research capable
Thinking Machines: Inkling Strengths
- Supports text and image input with text output
- Million-token context window for very long tasks
- Tool-use support for agentic workflows