Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Side-by-side comparison. Updated 2026-07-01.
Summary
Compare Claude Opus 4.6 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 across pricing, context window, modalities, strengths, weaknesses, and best-fit workloads.
Use the details below to weigh cost, context, modalities, and workload fit.
At a Glance
| Attribute | Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Tags | Intelligent Coding Agentic Long Context | Agentic Coding Intelligent |
| Context | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Input price | $5.00/1M | $3.00/1M |
| Output price | $25.00/1M | $15.00/1M |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, File | Image, Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
Claude Opus 4.6 Strengths
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Strengths
- Frontier performance across coding, agents, and professional work
- Most capable Sonnet-class model — closing gap with Opus tier
- Excellent for iterative development and complex codebase navigation
- Confident computer use for web QA and workflow automation