Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7
Side-by-side comparison. Updated 2026-07-11.
Summary
Compare Claude Sonnet 5 and Claude Opus 4.7 across pricing, context window, modalities, strengths, weaknesses, and best-fit workloads.
Use the details below to weigh cost, context, modalities, and workload fit.
At a Glance
| Attribute | Claude Sonnet 5 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Tags | Intelligent Reasoning Coding Agentic Image Input Long Context | Intelligent Reasoning Agentic Multimodal |
| Context | 1,000,000 tokens | 200,000 tokens |
| Input price | $2.00/1M | $15.00/1M |
| Output price | $10.00/1M | $75.00/1M |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, File | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
Claude Sonnet 5 Strengths
- 76.1% on Novel Compiler evaluation (vendor-reported)
- 1,000,000 token (~977K) context window with 128k output
- $2.00/M input tokens 85% cheaper than GPT-5.5 Pro
- 96.65% harmless response rate on API (vendor-reported)
- Up to 90% cost savings with prompt caching
Claude Opus 4.7 Strengths
- Top-tier complex reasoning and code generation
- Strong gains on SWE-bench Pro (+10.9%)
- MCP-Atlas improvement of +14.6%
- Supports adaptive-only thinking with 'xhigh' effort