Mistral: Codestral 2508 vs Mistral: Devstral 2 2512
Side-by-side comparison. Updated 2026-06-08.
Verdict
Mistral: Codestral 2508 wins on higher overall score (8.4 vs 8.3, +0.1).
- ~25% cheaper input
At a Glance
| Attribute | Mistral: Codestral 2508 | Mistral: Devstral 2 2512 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Mistral AI |
| Tags | Coding | Coding Agentic Open Weight |
| Context | 256,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Input price | $0.30/1M | $0.40/1M |
| Output price | $2.00/1M | $2.00/1M |
| Input modalities | Text, File | Text, File |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
Mistral: Codestral 2508 Strengths
- Specialized for coding with fill-in-the-middle (FIM) support
- Low-latency design for high-frequency coding tasks
- Strong at code correction and test generation
- 256K context window for large codebase understanding
- Mistral-grade quality at competitive pricing ($0.30/$0.90)
Mistral: Devstral 2 2512 Strengths
- State-of-the-art open-source agentic coding model
- 123B dense transformer with 256K context
- Specialized for software engineering workflows
- Strong extended thinking and self-correction