Z.ai: GLM 5 Turbo vs Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo
Side-by-side comparison. Updated 2026-07-11.
Summary
Compare Z.ai: GLM 5 Turbo and Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo across pricing, context window, modalities, strengths, weaknesses, and best-fit workloads.
Use the details below to weigh cost, context, modalities, and workload fit.
At a Glance
| Attribute | Z.ai: GLM 5 Turbo | Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z Ai | Z Ai |
| Tags | Fast Agentic | Multimodal Coding Agentic Image Input Video Input |
| Context | 202,752 tokens | 202,752 tokens |
| Input price | $1.20/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Output price | $4.00/1M | $4.00/1M |
| Input modalities | Text | Image, Text, Video |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
Z.ai: GLM 5 Turbo Strengths
- Fast inference with strong agent performance
- Optimized for real-world agent workflows
- Good coding and instruction following
- Competitive price-performance ratio
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo Strengths
- Native multimodal vision-language understanding
- Strong vision-based coding from screenshots and diagrams
- Long-horizon planning with visual context
- Agentic task execution across modalities